Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Fed going to act?

Speculation that the Fed will act to avert a brewing crisis credit crisis triggered a huge market rally today. Fed vice-chairman Don Kohn "dropped what investors saw as a clear hint that the US central bank was ready to cut interest rates again next month unless market conditions improve." This and the previous seemingly hawkish statements from other Fed officials appears to UU as just expectation management on the part of the Fed -- send out the hawkish guys that want a calamity first, like "Calamity" Bill, so not everyone gets their hopes up, then send out the dovish guys to get the everyone in position for "Helicopter" Ben's carpet bombing the market with paper coming out of his printing press on overdrive.

The Fed can rail against moral hazards all it want, but at the end of the day it is in everyone's best interest -- including the Fed's -- that the banking system stays functional. Whether it likes it or not, the Fed will have to bail out the market in some way. The most disciplining the Fed will do is shoot a few weak or unruly market participants as example, slap the rest on the wrist, let the survivors go their merry way and let the next round of financial "innovation" (excuse to put on more leverage) begin.

One of the headlines this week is the Abu Dhabi state investment vehicle injecting cash into Citibank. The opinions in the mainstream press and blogsphere have been nearly unanimously negative with the 11% coupon Citibank will be paying likened to junk bond rates. Andrew Clavell who writes Financial Crookery has a different opinion. Mr. Clavell's analysis seems rather reasonable to this blogger.

UU's short in OIH looked like it was going to take a hit with the market rallying and rather than risk turning a winning trade into a losing trade, he took half the chips off the table at an average price of 174.90 in morning. Given that big sell off in oil related items after the 10:30 EST inventory announcement, it appears that this blogger probably missed the boat on shorting crude oil. Oh well...such is life in speculation.



UU Paper Portfolio

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Too many speculators in crude oil?

Recently UU read an article published in the Taiwanese press in which one of Formosa Petrochemical's executives remarked that current crude oil prices are unsustainable. He pointed to the backwardation in crude's forward curve as evidence that the market no longer expects the price of crude to rise in the future. Intrigued, this blogger decided to take a look.



Indeed, crude's forward curve shifted from contango to backwardation between June and July. It is interesting to note that even after adjusting for the dollar's fall in recent months, the price of crude across the entire curve has increased.

Given current market conditions UU believes that oil may be worth a punt a or two in the coming months. Since the recent trend in OIH diverged from crude, UU shorted 30000 shares on Monday morning at an average price of $189.82 per share. That trade has worked out well so far. He will also look to put on some shorts in crude if crude jumps irrationally upon the release of inventory number -- this blogger now believes that low inventory numbers indicate lack of desire to carry inventory in the face of future declining prices rather than tight supply.

UU Paper Portfolio

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

The Known Known, Known Unknown and Unknown Unknown

A certain former Secretary of Defense once famously commented that "there are known knowns... there are known unknowns... but there are also unknown unknowns." This impromptu rhyme was the winner of the 2003 Foot in Mouth award and the subject of many lampoons. The competence of the much maligned former secretary aside, the comment struck a rather poetic accord with this blogger's view on much of life, especially in the context of speculation. Hence the name of this blog, "The Unknown Unknown."

"The Unknown Unknown" is particularly appropriate for describing unfolding current events. As of the writing of this commentary, the fixed income market is essentially non-functional. Many taken for granted assumptions no longer hold. Any collateral save AAA government bonds seems to be treated with suspect; everyone is suddenly (ir?)rationally paranoid about counter party risk. The covered bond market in Europe has essentially shutdown -- an early winter holiday for that market perhaps. US municipal bonds are rumored to be in an awful mess. Freddie Mac, an institution implicitly guaranteed by Uncle Sam -- some say with only a wink of an eye -- is exploring recapitalization. Fannie Mae the other GSE of similar stripes, is perhaps in the same boat. Citigroup, Merill Lynch, UBS and countless others have taken a bloodbath due to write downs on CDOs held on their balance sheets. All is certainly not well in fixed income land.

In addition to the problems in fixed income, the buck seems to be no longer a hard currency. Perhaps the most telling, Jay-Z's latest music video depicts him with €500 notes rather than "da Benjamin," the traditional rappers' note of choice -- the founder of UU's alma mater must be rolling over in his grave. The buck's seeming demise is new and strangely twisted to this blogger -- his native tongue practically equates the USD with gold, literally calling it "American gold." As it stands, it seems the buck is devaluing against virtually everything on the planet except toxic subprime mortgages.

Things are slightly calmer in equity land. Though the VIX is hovering around 25, the S&P 500 currently stands at where it started at the beginning of 2007 -- not great but not a complete disaster. The big story of this year is the massive quant fund deleveraging that occurred in August of this year. At the time, one of UU's friends in the industry remarked, "there is a great disturbance in the force." It seemed that the more Barra beta neutral optimized and previously profitable your portfolio was the more you disastrous your PnL was during the unwind. Though all seemed well to your average index punter, the dispersion of the index underlyers was moving in accordance to Murphy's Law against the long/short market neutral players. Matthew Rothman of Lehman Brothers commented to the Wall St. Journal that "events that models only predicted would happen once in 10,000 years happened every day for three days." The tempest seems not completely dissipated just yet; AQR and Goldman Sach's GEOs are rumored to be liquidating.

Yet all in all, this blogger believes that the overall sentiment in equity land so far looks to be somewhat less pessimistic than in fixed income land. That said, it appears that equity players are on edge. Going into year end they seem to have sold off quite a bit of their big winners to lock in the gains for the year. Emerging markets for one looks like such a case. Everyone is looking for tea leaf readings from the helicopter riding Federal Reserve chairman before getting back in it seems.

We are certainly experiencing interesting times and it is UU's belief that many profitable opportunities will arise. As a part of this blogger's exercise to document his continuing education in financial market speculation, he will maintain two paper portfolios and post updates of them regularly in the fashion of Macro Man, who's blogging inspired UU's foray into the same.

The first portfolio will be a naively simplistic relative value portfolio employing traditional CTA and black box macro techniques. It will essentially be a collection of systematic trend following and mean reversion strategies with dabbles of short volatility and short correlation plays, all quantitative in nature. The main exercise for this portfolio is risk management. Since all the aforementioned strategies are essentially the equivalent of driving by looking into a rear view mirror, they will be particularly susceptible to fail quite spectacularly in the face of an unknown unknown or what a recently published book calls a "Black Swan." Mitigating that risk will be essential to its profitability and long run survival.

The second portfolio will be geared towards adhoc contrarian views and attempts to capture the unknown unknown in a profitable manner. By the nature of its stated mission, this portfolio will be discretionary and highly subject to the whims of this blogger who confesses that there may be many trades in this hypothetical portfolio that will be very unscientific and utterly random -- this portfolio will be UU's hypothetical "punt" book.

The two portfolios will be components of a fictional $100 million AUM hedge fund where risk capital will be allocated between the two different schools of speculation. Since UU has not found time to back test some simple models, the initial trades will be in the "punt" portfolio.